I have said here will have become clearer. Jesuit sect which nothing could induce him democracy essay in english tolerate. Is not this the very picture of a small academic?
It was so easy to depose their predecessors, not all verifiable events are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Gun Control or People Control? But when there is nobody there to enforce the rules for the government itself, during the mid, often found themselves hoisted to the highest ranks of Athenian politics. And believed in the necessity of class separation of the proletariat from the bourgeoisie, perhaps based on the quote by late President Dr.
English prose, and especially of any kind of political writing. The keynote is the elimination of simple verbs. English words that will cover one’s meaning. When one critic writes, “The outstanding feature of Mr.
The immediately striking thing about Mr. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. English of the worst sort. This is a parody, but not a very gross one. The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness. Now analyze these two sentences a little more closely.
Latin roots, and one from Greek. I do not want to exaggerate. The attraction of this way of writing is that it is easy. This is the significance of mixed metaphors. Look again at the examples I gave at the beginning of this essay. What am I trying to say? What words will express it?
What image or idiom will make it clearer? Is this image fresh enough to have an effect? Could I put it more shortly? Have I said anything that is avoidably ugly? But you are not obliged to go to all this trouble.
In our time it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing. And this is not altogether fanciful. The inflated style itself is a kind of euphemism. The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When the general atmosphere is bad, language must suffer. But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. I have received a pamphlet dealing with conditions in Germany.
I said earlier that the decadence of our language is probably curable. In prose, the worst thing one can do with words is surrender to them. Never us a long word where a short one will do. Never use the passive where you can use the active. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous. This article has multiple issues.
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time. Economist Donald Wittman has written numerous works attempting to counter criticisms of democracy common among his colleagues.
He argues democracy is efficient based on the premise of rational voters, competitive elections, and relatively low political transactions costs. Economist Bryan Caplan argues that, while Wittman makes strong arguments for the latter two points, the first is vitiated by the insurmountable evidence for voter irrationality. The problem is not merely the voters’ lack of information, but their poor judgement. For many voters, the difficulty of learning about a particular issue is too high compared to the likely costs of ignorance, but this ignorance does not lessen their enthusiasm for voting. Other economists, such as Meltzer and Richard, have added that as industrial activity in a democracy increases, so too do the people’s demands for subsidies and support from the government. In this way, they argue, democracies are inefficient. Such a system could result in a wealth disparity or racial discrimination.